Satellite models.
Turning macro scenarios into risk parameters.

The link between GDP, unemployment, rates and house prices on one side, and default and loss rates on the other. For the EBA stress test, ICAAP and climate scenarios.

Default rate · history and projectionIllustrative
4%2%0%2008201720262029Projection
ObservedBaselineAdverse
Regulatory basis
EBA EU-wide stress test methodology · SSM expectations for ICAAP
Portfolios
By segment, country and sector
Outputs
PD and LGD paths under baseline and adverse scenarios
Used for
EBA stress test, ICAAP, climate scenarios, IFRS 9
Approach

Statistically sound, and economically sensible.

01

Driver shortlist

Candidate macro variables per segment, matched to the scenario variables provided.

02

Specification

Transformations and lag structures searched by agents, ranked by fit and parsimony.

03

Economic plausibility

Sign constraints and sensitivity checks rule out models that fit but don't make sense.

04

Projection

Paths under each scenario, with the methodology's constraints applied.

Data

What you need. And what happens if you don't have it.

DataNeededIf missing or incomplete
Default rate time seriesRequired · at least one full cyclePooled segments, with added conservatism
Macro historyRequiredPublic statistical series
Scenario pathsRequiredSupervisory or internal scenarios
Segment and sector mappingRequiredProposed by the agent for approval
In Model Studio 0.1.0

Every choice is a decision for a person. Every test has its threshold on the page.

Decisions the agents propose

Each comes with a recommended option, the reason and any data gap. The model owner approves the set at the design gate.

  1. Driver shortlist
    Which macro variables may enter the model?
  2. Lag structure
    Up to how many quarters may a driver lead the default rate?
  3. Model size
    How many drivers per model?
  4. Economic plausibility
    Are sign constraints enforced?
  5. Out-of-sample test
    How many recent quarters are held out?
  6. Segments
    Which segments get their own model?
Tests the engine runs

Shown next to each result. A test outside its threshold stays visible and becomes a limitation in the documentation.

TestGroupThreshold
In-sample fit and residual diagnosticsFitResiduals stationary (ADF p < 0.10); autocorrelation handled by HAC errors
Out-of-sample performanceForecastRMSE reported; champion ≤ 1.2 × challenger
Sign consistency with economic theoryPlausibilityNo coefficient with the wrong sign
Stability across sample periodsStabilityNo sign change between halves
Comparison with challenger modelsChallengerReported
Scenario sensitivityPlausibilityReported
Model Studio testing step for satellite models, with fit, out-of-sample, sign and stability tests per segment
Testing on the synthetic satellite demo: each segment model against fit, forecast, plausibility and stability tests. Synthetic data; the results are illustrative.
Related models
All of Model Studio →
PD modelsBuilt from the defaults you can observeExplore →IFRS 9 ECLLifetime losses, staged and forward-lookingExplore →Behavioural modelsHow customers really repay and saveExplore →

Satellite models for 2027?
See them built on your data.

Talk to sales

We'll walk through your use case and show the product on data structured like yours.

Talk to sales Book a 30-minute call
[sales@yourdomain.eu][+31 20 000 0000]
Talk to sales