IFRS 9 ECL.
Lifetime losses, staged and forward-looking.

Point-in-time PD, LGD and EAD term structures, staging criteria and probability-weighted macro scenarios, with every overlay approved and traceable.

Cumulative lifetime PD by macro scenarioIllustrative
15%10%5%0%Year 0510
Upside
25%
Base
50%
Downside
25%
Scenario weights
Regulatory basis
IFRS 9 · EBA GL on credit risk management and ECL accounting
Portfolios
Amortised cost and FVOCI exposures
Outputs
12-month and lifetime parameters, staging, probability-weighted ECL
Used for
Financial reporting, provisioning, stress testing
Approach

Reuse what your IRB models know. Make it point-in-time and forward-looking.

01

Point-in-time parameters

Convert through-the-cycle estimates and build lifetime term structures.

02

Staging

Quantitative and qualitative criteria for a significant increase in credit risk.

03

Macro scenarios

Link parameters to scenarios and weight them, reusing your satellite models.

04

Overlays

Post-model adjustments with rationale, approval and release tracked.

Data

What you need. And what happens if you don't have it.

DataNeededIf missing or incomplete
Origination rating or PDRequiredProxy at transition date, documented
Contractual cash flowsRequired—
Macro forecastsRequiredOfficial or bank-internal scenarios
Forbearance and watch-list flagsHelpfulDays-past-due backstop only
In Model Studio 0.1.0

Every choice is a decision for a person. Every test has its threshold on the page.

Decisions the agents propose

Each comes with a recommended option, the reason and any data gap. The model owner approves the set at the design gate.

  1. PIT conversion
    Which asset correlation links PDs to the credit cycle?
  2. Scenario link
    How do scenario paths move PDs?
  3. Scenario weights
    How are scenarios weighted?
  4. Reversion
    After the scenario horizon, how fast do PDs revert to TTC?
  5. SICR · relative threshold
    Lifetime PD increase since origination that signals a significant increase in credit risk
  6. Backstop
    Days-past-due backstop for stage 2
Tests the engine runs

Shown next to each result. A test outside its threshold stays visible and becomes a limitation in the documentation.

TestGroupThreshold
Staging stability and transfer ratesStaging≤ 10% of stage 1 moves
Back-testing of ECL against realised lossesBack-testingReported
Sensitivity to scenario weightsScenariosReported
Overlay tracking and releaseOverlaysEvery overlay approved with a release condition
Reconciliation to the general ledgerReconciliationReported
Model Studio estimation step for an IFRS 9 model with ECL, coverage, stage 2 share and post-model adjustments
Estimation on the synthetic IFRS 9 demo, with overlays that each need a rationale, a release condition and a second approver. Synthetic data; the results are illustrative.
Related models
All of Model Studio →
PD modelsBuilt from the defaults you can observeExplore →Satellite modelsMacro scenarios into risk parametersExplore →LGD modelsFrom recovery cash flows to downturn LGDExplore →

Reviewing your ECL models?
See it done on your data.

Talk to sales

We'll walk through your use case and show the product on data structured like yours.

Talk to sales Book a 30-minute call
[sales@yourdomain.eu][+31 20 000 0000]
Talk to sales